The Church of the Alps had peace for twenty-eight years. This
was a time of great spiritual prosperity. Sanctuaries arose in all her Valleys;
her pastors and teachers were found too few, and men of learning and zeal, some
of them from foreign lands, pressed into her service. Individuals and families
in the cities on the plain of Piedmont embraced her faith; and the crowds that
attended her worship were continually growing. [George Morel states, in his
Memoirs, that at this time there were more then 800,000 persons of the religion
of the Vaudois. (Leger, Hist. des Vaudois, livr. ii., p. 27.) He includes, of
course, in this estimate the Vaudois in the Valleys, on the plain of Piedmont,
in Naples and Calabria, in the South of France, and in the countries of
Germany.] In short, this venerable Church had a second youth. Her lamp,
retrimmed, burned with a brightness that justified her time-honoured motto, "A
light shining in darkness." The darkness was not now so deep as it had been; the
hours of night were drawing to a close. Nor was the Vaudois community the only
light that now shone in Christendom. It was one of a constellation of lights,
whose brilliance was beginning to irradiate the skies of the Church with an
effulgence which no former age had known.
The exemption from persecution, which the Waldenses enjoyed
during this period, was not absolute, but comparative. The lukewarm are seldom
molested; and the quickened zeal of the Vaudois brought with it a revival of the
persecutor’s malignity, though it did not find vent in violences so dreadful as
the tempests that had lately smitten them. Only two years after the synod—that
is, in 1534--wholesale destruction fell upon the Vaudois Churches of Provence;
but the sad story of their extinction will more appropriately be told elsewhere.
In the valleys of Piedmont events were from time to time occurring that showed
that the inquisitor’s vengeance had been scotched, not killed. While the Vaudois
as a race were prosperous, their churches multiplying, and their faith extending
its geographical area from one year to another, individual Vaudois were being at
times seized, and put to death, at the stake, on the rack, or by the
cord.
Three years after, the persecution broke out anew, and raged
for a short time. Charles III. of Savoy, a prince of mild manners, but under the
rule of the priests, being solicited by the Archbishop of Turin and the
inquisitor of the same city, gave his consent to "hunting down" the heretics of
the Valleys. The commission was given to a nobleman of the name of Bersour,
whose residence was at Pinerolo, near the entrance of the Valley of Perosa.
Bersour, a man of savage disposition, collected a troop of 500 horse and foot,
and attacked the Valley of Angrogna. He was repulsed, but the storm which had
rolled away from the mountains fell upon the plains. Turning to the Vaudois who
resided around his own residence, he seized a great number of persons, whom he
threw into the prisons and convents of Pinerolo and the Inquisition of Turin.
Many of them suffered in the flames. One of these martyrs, Catalan Girard,
quaintly taught the spectators a parabolic lesson, standing at the pile. From
amid the flames he asked for two stones, which were instantly brought him. The
crowd looked on in silence, curious to know what he meant to do with them.
Rubbing them against each other, he said, "You think to extinguish our poor
Churches by your persecutions. You can no more do so, than I with my feeble
hands can crush these stones" [Leger, livr. ii., p. 27].
Heavier tempests seemed about to descend, when suddenly the
sky cleared above the confessors of the Alps. It was a change in the politics of
Europe in this instance, as in many others, that stayed the arm of persecution.
Francis I. of France demanded of Charles, Duke of Savoy, permission to march an
army through his dominions. The object of the French king was the recovery of
the Duchy of Milan, a long-contested prize between himself and Charles V. The
Duke of Savoy refused the request of his brother monarch; but reflecting that
the passes of the Alps were in the hands of the men whom he was persecuting, and
that should he continue his oppressions, the Vaudois might open the gates of his
kingdom to the enemy, he sent orders to Bersour to stop the persecution in the
Valleys.
In 1536, the Waldensian Church had to mourn the loss of one
of the more distinguished of her pastors. Martin Gonin, of Angrogna—a man of
public spirit and rare gifts—who had gone to Geneva on ecclesiastical affairs,
was returning through Dauphine, when he was apprehended on suspicion of being a
spy. he cleared himself of that charge, but the gaoler searching his person, and
discovering certain papers upon him, he was convicted of what the parliament of
Grenoble accounted a much greater crime—heresy. Condemned to die, he was led
forth at night, and drowned in the river Isere. He would have suffered at the
stake had not his persecutors feared the effect of his dying words upon the
spectators [Monastier, p. 153].
There were others, also called to ascend the martyr-pile,
whose names we must not pass over in silence. Two pastors returning from Geneva
to their flocks in the Valleys, in company of three French Protestants, were
seized at the Col de Tamiers, in Savoy, and carried to Chambery. There all five
were tried, condemned, and burned. The fate of Nicolas Sartoire is yet more
touching. He was a student of theology at Geneva, and held one of those
bursaries which the Lords of Bern had allotted for the training of young men as
pastors in the Churches of the Valleys. He set out to spend his holiday with his
family in Piedmont. We know how Vaudois heart yearns for its native mountains;
nor would the coming of the youth awaken less lively anticipations on the part
of his friends. The paternal threshold, alas! he was never to cross; his native
Valleys he was to tread no more. Travelling by the pass of St. Bernard, and the
grand valley of Aosta, he had just passed the Italian frontier, when he was
apprehended on the suspicion of heresy. It was the month of May, when all was
life and beauty in the vales and mountains around him; he himself was in the
spring-time of existence; it was hard to lay down life at such a moment; but the
great captain from whose feet he had just come, had taught him that the first
duty of a soldier of Christ is obedience. He confessed his Lord, nor could
promises or threats—and both were tried—make him waver. He continued steadfast
unto the end, and on the 4th of May, 1557, he was brought forth from his dungeon
at Aosta, and burned alive [Leger, livr. ii., p. 29].
The martyr who died thus heroically at Aosta was a youth, the
one we are now to contemplate was a man of fifty. Geofroi Varaile was a native
of the town of Busco, in Piedmont. His father had been a captain in that army of
murderers who, in 1488, ravaged the Valleys of Lucerna and Angrogna. The son in
1520 became a monk, and possessing the gift of a rare eloquence, he was sent on
a preaching tour, in company with another cowled ecclesiastic, yet more famous,
Bernardo Ochino of Sienna, the founder of the order of the Capuchins. The
arguments of the men he was sent to convert staggered Varaile. He fled to
Geneva, and in the city of the Reformers he was taught more fully the "way of
life." Ordained as a pastor, he returned to the Valleys, where "like another
Paul, says Leger, "he preached the faith he once destroyed." After a ministry of
some months, he set out to pay a visit of a few days to his native town of
Busco. He was apprehended by the monks who were lying in wait for him. He was
condemned to death by the Inquisition of Turin. His execution took place in the
castle-piazza of the same city, March 29th, 1558. He walked to the place where
he was to die with a firm step and a serene countenance; he addressed the vast
multitude around his pile in a way that drew tears from many eyes; after this,
he began to sing with a loud voice, and so continued till he sank amid the
flames [Leger, livr. ii., p. 29].
Two years before this, the same piazza, the castle-yard at
Turin, had witnessed a similar spectacle. Barthelemy Hector was a bookseller in
Poictiers. A man of warm but well-tempered zeal, he travelled as far as the
Valleys, diffusing that knowledge that maketh wise unto salvation. In the
assemblage of white peaks that look down on the Pra del Tor is one named La
Vechera, so called because the cows love the rich grass that clothes its sides
in summer-time. Barthelemy Hector would take his seat on the slopes of the
mountain, and gathering the herdsmen and agriculturists of the Pra round him,
would induce them to buy his books, by reading passages to them. Portions of the
Scriptures also would he recite to the grandames and maidens as they watched
their goats, or plied the distaff. His steps were tracked by the inquisitor,
even amid these wild solitudes. He was dragged to Turin, to answer for the crime
of selling Genevese books. His defence before his judges discovered an admirable
courage and wisdom.
"You have been caught in the act," said his judge, "of
selling books that contain heresy. What say you?"
"If the Bible is heresy to you, it is truth to me," replied
the prisoner.
"But you use the Bible to deter men from going to mass,"
urged the judge.
"If the Bible deters men from going to mass," responded
Barthelemy,
"it is a proof that God disapproves of it, and that mass is idolatry."
"it is a proof that God disapproves of it, and that mass is idolatry."
The judge, deeming it expedient to make short shrift with
such a heretic, exclaimed, "Retract."
"I have spoken only truth," said the bookseller, "can I
change truth as I would a garment?"
His judges kept him some months in prison, in the hope that
his recantation would save them the necessity of burning him. This unwillingness
to have resort to the last penalty was owing to no feeling of pity for the
prisoner, but entirely to the conviction that these repeated executions were
endangering the cause of their Church. "The smoke of these martyr-piles," as was
said with reference to the death of Patrick Hamilton, "was infecting those on
whom it blew." But the constancy of Barthelemy compelled his persecutors to
disregard these prudential considerations. At last, despairing of his
abjuration, they brought him forth and consigned him to the flames. His
behaviour at the stake "drew rivers of tears," says Leger, "from the eyes of
many in the Popish crowd around his stake, while others vented reproaches and
invectives against the cruelty of the monks and the inquisitors [Leger, Livr.
ii., p. 28].
These are only a few of the many martyrs by whom, even during
this period of comparative peace and prosperity, the Church of the Valleys was
called to testify against Rome. Some of these martyrs perished by cruel,
barbarous, and most horrible methods. To recite all these cases would be beyond
our purpose, and to depict the revolting and infamous details would be to
narrate what no reader could peruse. We shall quote only part of the brief
summary of Muston. "There is no town in Piedmont," says he, "under a Vaudois
pastor, where some of our brethren have not been put to death ... Hugo Chiamps
of Finestrelle had his entrails torn from his living body, at Turin. Peter
Geymarali of Bobbio, in like manner, had his entrails taken out at Lucerna, and
a fierce cat thrust in their place to torture him further; Maria Romano was
buried alive at Rocco-patia; Magdalen Foulano underwent the same fate at San
Giovanni; Susan Michelini was bound hand and foot, and left to perish of cold
and hunger at Saracena. Bartholomew Fache, gashed with sabres, had the wounds
filled up with quicklime, and perished thus in agony at Fenile; Daniel Michelini
had his tongue torn out at Bobbio for having praised God. James Baridari
perished covered with sulphurous matches, which had been forced into his flesh
under the nails, between the fingers, in the nostrils, in the lips, and over all
his body, and then lighted. Daniel Revelli had his mouth filled with gunpowder,
which, being lighted, blew his head to pieces. Maria Monnen, taken at Liousa,
had the flesh cut from her cheek and chin bone, so that her jaw was left bare,
and she was thus left to perish. Paul Garnier was slowly sliced to pieces at
Rora. Thomas Margueti was mutilated in an indescribable manner at Miraboco, and
Susan Jaquin cut in bits at La Torre. Sara Rostagnol was slit open from the legs
to the bosom, and so left to perish on the road between Eyral and Lucerna. Anne
Charbonnier was impaled and carried thus on a pike, as a standard, from San
Giovanni to La Torre. Daniel Rambaud, at Paesano, had his nails torn off, then
his fingers chopped off, then his feet and his hands, then his arms and his
legs, with each successive refusal on his part to abjure the Gospel" [Muston,
Israel of the Alps, chap. 8.] Thus the roll of martyrs runs on, and with each
new sufferer comes a new, a more excruciating and more horrible mode of torture
and death.
We have already mentioned the demand which the King of France
made upon the Duke of Savoy, Charles III., that he would permit him to march an
army through his territories. The reply was a refusal; but Francis I. must needs
have a road into Italy. Accordingly he seized upon Piedmont, and held possession
of it, together with the Waldensian valleys, for twenty-three years. The
Waldenses had found the sway of Francis I. more tolerant than that of their own
princes; for though Francis hated Lutheranism, the necessities of his policy
often compelled him to court the Lutherans, and so it came to pass that while he
was burning heretics in Paris he spared them in the Valleys. But the general
peace of Chateau Cambresis, April 3rd, 1559, restored Piedmont, with the
exception of Turin, to its former rulers of the House of Savoy [Leger, livr.
ii., p. 29.] Charles III. had been succeeded in 1553 by Emmanuel Philibert.
Philibert was a prince of superior talents and humane disposition, and the
Vaudois cherished the hope that under him they would be permitted to live in
peace, and to worship as their fathers had done. What strengthened these just
expectations was the fact that Philibert had married a sister of the King of
France, Henry II., who had been carefully instructed in the Protestant faith by
her illustrious relations, Margaret, Queen of Navarre, and Renee of France,
daughter of Louis XII. But, alas! the treaty that restored Emmanuel Philibert to
the throne of his ancestors, contained a clause binding the contracting parties
to extinguish heresy. This was to send him back to his subjects with a dagger in
his hand.
Whatever the king might incline—and, strengthened by the
counsels of his Protestant queen, he would doubtless, if he could, have dealt
humanely by his faithful subjects, the Vaudois—his intentions were overborne by
men of stronger wills and more determined resolves. The inquisitors of his
kingdom, the nuncio of the Pope, and the ambassadors of Spain and France, united
in urging upon him the purgation of his dominions, in terms of the agreement in
the Treaty of Peace. The unhappy monarch, unable to resist these powerful
solicitations, issued on the 15th February, 1560, an edict forbidding his
subjects to hear the Protestant preachers in the Valley of Lucerna, or anywhere
else, under pain of a fine of 100 dollars of gold for the first offence, and of
the galleys for life for the second. This edict had reference mainly to the
Protestants on the plain of Piedmont, who resorted in crowds to hear sermon in
the Valleys. There followed, however, in a short time, a yet severer edict,
commanding attendance at mass under pain of death. To carry out this cruel
decree, a commission was given to a prince of the blood, Philip of Savoy, Count
de Raconis, and with him was associated George Costa, Count de la Trinita, and
Thomas Jacomel, the Inquisitor-General, a man as cruel in disposition as he was
licentious in manners. To these was added a certain Councillor Corbis, but he
was not of the stuff which the business required, and so, after witnessing a few
initial scenes of barbarity and horror, he resigned his commission [Monastier,
chap. 19, p. 172. Muston, chap. 10, p. 52].
The first burst of the tempest fell on Carignano. This town
reposes sweetly on one of the spurs of the Apennines, about twenty miles to the
south-west of Turin. It contained many Protestants, some of whom were of good
position. The wealthiest were selected and dragged to the burning-pile, in order
to strike terror into the rest. The blow had not fallen in vain; the professors
of the Protestant creed in Carignano were scattered; some fled to Turin, then
under the domination of France, some to other places, and some, alas! frightened
by the tempest in front, turned back and sought refuge in the darkness behind
them. They had desired the "better country," but could not enter in at the cost
of exile and death.
Having done its work in Carignano, this desolating tempest
held its way across the plain of Piedmont, towards those great mountains which
were the ancient fortress of the truth, marking its track through the villages
and country communes in terror, in pillage, and blood. It moved like one of
those thunder-clouds which the traveller on the Alps may often descry beneath
him, traversing the same plain, and shooting its lightnings earthwards as it
advances. Wherever it was known that there was a Vaudois congregation, thither
did the cloud turn. And now we behold it at the foot of the Waldensian Alps—at
the entrance of the Valleys, within whose mighty natural bulwarks crowds of
fugitives from the towns and villages on the plain have already found
asylum.
Rumours of the confiscations, arrests, cruel tortures, and
horrible deaths which had befallen the Churches at the foot of their mountains,
had preceded the appearance of the crusaders at the entrance of the Valleys. The
same devastation which had befallen the flourishing Churches on the plain of
Piedmont, seemed to impend over the Churches in the bosom of the Alps. At this
juncture the pastors and leading laymen assembled to deliberate on the steps to
be taken. Having fasted and humbled themselves before God, they sought by
earnest prayer the direction of his Holy Spirit [Leger, livr. ii., p. 29.] They
resolved to approach the throne of their prince, and by humble remonstrance and
petition, set forth the state of their affairs and the justice of their cause.
Their first claim was to be heard before being condemned—a right denied to no
one accused, however criminal. They next solemnly disclaimed the main offence
laid to their charge, that of departing from the true faith, and of adopting
doctrines unknown to the Scriptures, and the early ages of the Church. Their
faith was that which Christ Himself had taught; which the apostles, following
their Great Master, had preached; which the Fathers had vindicated with their
pens, and the martyrs with their blood, and which the first four Councils had
ratified, and proclaimed to be the faith of the Christian world. From the "old
paths," the Bible and all antiquity being witnesses, they had never turned
aside; from father to son they had continued these 1,500 years to walk therein.
Their mountains shielded no novelties; they had bowed the knee to no strange
gods, and, if they were heretics, so too were the first four Councils; and so
too were the apostles themselves. If they erred, it was in the company of the
confessors and martyrs of the early ages. They were willing any moment to appeal
their cause to a General Council, provided that Council were willing to decide
the question by the only infallible standard they knew, the Word of God. If on
this evidence they should be convicted of even one heresy, most willingly would
they surrender it. On this, the main point of their indictment, what more could
they promise? Show us, they said, what the errors are which you ask us to
renounce under the penalty of death, and you shall not need to ask a second
time.
["First, we do protest before the Almighty and All-just God,
before whose tribunal we must all one day appear, that we intend to live and die
in the holy faith, piety, and religion of our Lord Jesus Christ, and that we do
abhor all heresies that have been, and are, condemned by the Word of God. We do
embrace the most holy doctrine of the prophets and apostles, as likewise of the
Nicene and Athanasian Creeds; we do subscribe to the four Councils, and to all
the ancient Fathers, in all such things as are not repugnant to the analogy of
faith." (Leger, livr. ii., pp. 30-1.)]
Their duty to God did not weaken their allegiance to their
prince. To piety they added loyalty. The throne before which they now stood had
not more faithful and devoted subjects than they. When had they plotted treason,
or disputed lawful command of their sovereign? Nay, the more they feared God,
the more they honoured the king. Their services, their substance, their life,
were all at the disposal of their prince; they were willing to lay them all down
in defence of his lawful prerogative; one thing only they could not
surrender—their conscience.
As regarded their Romanist fellow-subjects of Piedmont, they
had lived in good-neighbourhood with them. Whose person had they injured—whose
property had they robbed—whom had they over-reached in their bargains? Had they
not been kind, courteous, honest? If their hills had vied in fertility with the
naturally richer plains at their feet, and if their mountain-homes had been
filled with store of corn, and oil, and wine, not always found in Piedmontese
dwellings, to what was this owing, save to their superior industry, frugality,
and skill? Never had marauding expedition descended from their hills to carry
off the goods of their neighbours, or to inflict retaliation for the many
murders and robberies to which they had had to submit. Why, then, should their
neighbours rise against them to exterminate them, as if they were a horde of
evil-doers, in whose neighbourhood no man could live in peace; and why should
their sovereign unsheathe the sword against those who had never been found
disturbers of his kingdom, nor plotters against his government, but who, on the
contrary, had ever striven to maintain the authority of his law, and the honour
of his throne? "One thing is certain, most serene prince," they said, in
conclusion, "that the Word of God will not perish, but will abide for ever. If,
then, our religion is the pure Word of God, as we are persuaded it is, and not a
human invention, no human power will be able to abolish it." [See in Leger
(livr. ii., pp. 30-1) the petition of the Vaudois presented "Au Serenissime et
tres-Puissant Prince, Philibert Emmanuel, Due de Savoye, Prince de Piemont,
notre tres-Clement Seigneur" (To the Serene and most Mighty Prince, Philibert
Emmanuel, Duke of Savoy, Prince of Piedmont, our most Gracious
Lord).]
Never was there a more solemn, or a more just, or a more
respectful remonstrance presented to any throne. The wrong about to be done them
was enormous, yet not an angry word, nor a single accusatory sentence, do the
Vaudois permit themselves to utter. But to what avail this solemn protest, this
triumphant vindication? The more complete and conclusive it is, the more
manifest does it make the immense injustice and the flagrant criminality of the
House of Savoy. The more the Vaudois put themselves in the right, the more they
put the Church of Rome in the wrong; and they who have already doomed them to
perish are but the more resolutely determined to carry out their
purpose.
This document was accompanied by two others: one to the
queen, and one to the Council. The one to the queen is differently conceived
from that to the duke. They offer no apology for their faith: the queen herself
was of it. They allude in a few touching terms to the sufferings they had
already been subjected to, and to the yet greater that appeared to impend. This
was enough, they knew, to awaken all her sympathies, and enlist her as their
advocate with the king, after the example of Esther, and other noble women in
former times, who valued their lofty station less for its dazzling honours, than
for the opportunities it gave them of shielding the persecuted confessors of the
truth. [See in Leger (livr. ii., p. 32), "A la tres-Vertueuse et tres-Excellente
Dame, Madame Marguerite de France, Duchesse de Savoye et de Berry"—"the petition
of her poor and humble subjects, the inhabitants of the Valleys of Lucerna and
Angrogna, and Perosa and San Martino, and all those of the plain who call purely
upon the name of the Lord Jesus."]
The remonstrance presented to the Council was couched in
terms more plain and direct, yet still respectful. They bade the counsellors of
the king beware what they did; they warned them that every drop of innocent
blood they should spill they would one day have to account for; that if the
blood of Abel, though only that of one man, cried with a voice so loud that God
heard it in heaven, and came down to call its shedder to reckoning, how much
mightier the cry that would arise from the blood of a whole nation, and how much
more terrible the vengeance with which it would be visited! In fine, they
reminded the Council that what they asked was not an unknown privilege in
Piedmont, nor would they be the first or the only persons who had enjoyed the
indulgence if it should be extended to them. Did not the Jew and the Saracen
live unmolested in their cities? Did they not permit the Israelite to build his
synagogue, and the Moor to read his Koran, without annoyance or restraint? Was
it a great thing that the faith of the Bible should be placed on the same level
in this respect with that of the Crescent, and that the descendants of the men
who for generations had been the subjects of the House of Savoy, and who had
enriched the dominions with their virtues, and defended them with their blood,
should be treated with the same humanity that was shown to the alien and the
unbeliever?
These petitions the confessors of the Alps dispatched to the
proper quarter, and having done so, they waited an answer with eyes lifted up to
heaven. If that answer should be peace, with what gratitude to God and to their
prince would they hail it! should it be otherwise, they were ready to accept
that alternative too; they were prepared to die.
Comments